adr

• 10:43:16 pm on Noviembre 1, 2009 | # | 1
  

  Hi everyone @anodinelite: I liked very much the post ..i also think that Nick´s propositions fall into a greedy reductionism, which is one of the vices of the scholastic view that is reproduced ‘practically’ in many fields of knowledge. @kvond Kevin I don´t think it sounds latourian at all: she is not talking about actors or actants neither about networks, she is talking about fields of knowledge and their strategic relations and tendencies, which is more like bourdieusian. I don´t think all the sociological leads to a greedy reductionism, at least not Bourdieu´s relationism. In fact, i think the problem is that Nick is somehow applying the very infamous early-latourian laboratory operation -or something near that-, so to embrace his standpoints: the 6 propositions are the proof of it.

  Comentado por Naxos en:

  Politics and greedy reductionism

  November 1, 2009 7:08 AM