Conversación en Larval Subjects

Forgive my broken english, I am not able to unfold all the thougts that this post provoque me (spanish is my native language). I find that the elements of Burke´s pentad are very framed: for example, saying “act” leads us to an individual frame that concerns more to an “actor” than to the agent. The same applies to the “scene” if we want to refer to a “situation”. I find this terms pretty mixed up when its desirable to unframe them in order to introduce enunciation as a significative strata that folds and sediments history. Maybe if we consider this pentad elements without such analitic frames, we can grasp discoursive magnitudes. When the agent execercises or embodies pharresia beyond the situation where its sumerged, the historical sediments begin to flow and the power relations loose their heaviness. Thats foucault`s ultimate lesson.

Comentado por Naxos en:

Scene and act

Jueves 07 febrero 08 6:08pm

Powered by ScribeFire.